Nov. 26th, 2009

polutrope: (Default)
So I read Ben Hur. It was exactly as ridiculous as it should be. (Also, now that I think of it, I read an abridged version at camp a long time ago.) Wallace is actually a good writer, although he follows the 19th century convention of having historical novel characters use thee and thou all over the place. The race scene is particularly thrilling (and Messala doesn't die, he just gets crippled for life), especially as a former racer myself, though not of chariots.

Speaking of Messala, although Wallace's project was clearly not to create a masterpiece of characterization, would it have hurt to make the guy a little less insufferable? I don't mind villains, if they carry it off well, but there's a way to do smug and self-satisfied that makes me like them, and all I wanted to do with Messala was smear a pie in his face.

The Jesus-business was very interesting - not the conversion, which felt shoehorned in*, but the discussion of His execution. Surprisingly enough for the author a proselytizing work, Wallace goes into the political reasons - that the Romans had interfered with the governance of the Jews and even the appointment of the high priest; that the nobles and the common people were at variance; and that because of these things the province was a powder-keg.

____
*The plot: Messala is a jerkface, gets Ben-Hur sent to the galleys and his mother and sister imprisoned. Ben-Hur comes back, gets revenge. Awesome chariot race! Ben-Hur is very very rich! Messala gets a pretty lady to betray Ben-Hur! Oh also he follows Jesus and helps build the catacombs in Rome. But mainly revenge!

**Note on my music: Lascia ch'io pianga is kind of awful for male voice, sry2say

Profile

polutrope: (Default)
Theodora Elucubrare

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910 1112 131415
16 17 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 05:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary